What is wrong with the UN?
Let’s talk about Human Rights and Globalist BS
In the past few months, the United States and its Western allies in Europe have been much more vocal about a massive Human Rights issue. That issue, of course, is the treatment of Muslim Uyghurs in China’s Xinjiang province.
For quite some time, the Chinese and the CCP have rounded up minority Uyghurs and placed them in concentration camps. China, having repeatedly denied such wrongdoings, yet also calls such camps “re-education camps”. What goes on there, no one is certain, but Uyghurs have suffered torture, sterilization, indoctrination, dehumanizing acts, etc.
Here is a recent video, for example, showing a man who allegedly survived his time in one such camp. He is unable to walk normally due to permanent damage from his brutal treatment in confinement.
Why is this context important though? Well, China recently became a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council for the first time. This is a controversial decision, obviously, but I am going to present you some reasons why.
China’s Diplomatic Trickery
China is a crafty nation, no doubt. It has some massive successes, and one of them is the ability for their one-party state to effectively project its message to the international community with little to no scrutiny from within its own borders.
One such message came today, when a Chinese communist official made a statement with the UN, stating what measures the US should do to address its human rights abuses… Yup.
You can watch below:
In the video clip, you can see the Chinese statement wishing for the US to root out its “systematic racism” and widespread police brutality, for example. Of course instances of such wrongdoings exist, but the claim that they are systematic and commonplace is entirely unsubstantiated.
This is precisely the reason China’s statement is so tricky though; it allows a legitimate power (the Chinese state) to irrefutably make an inflammatory statement that many, such as BLM or Antifa, can act upon. It sows discord and division and if the US does nothing, it will ultimately lead to more violence and unrest, as we have seen with the perpetual rioting.
Not only that, but it has the worldly authority and audience of the UN to back up its claims.
This is a massively effective measure on the Chinese’s part, and we can expect more of it in the future. Why? Because the UN wrongly gives the Chinese legitimacy to perpetuate its own Leftist, Globalist goals.
Some may say this isn’t the case, but let us look at yet ANOTHER development form the UN today…
The UN’s Wrongdoing
Today, the UN sent this absurd statement, on behalf of North Korea, to the masses:
Using the façade of systematic racism in the US, the UN slipped in a North Korean demand, very much in tandem with the earlier Chinese request, for the US to abolish the North Korea Human Rights Act of 2004. This is absolutely absurd, as not only does this act form the basis for US policy in the Korean peninsula, but it is also instrumental in our hard stance on China.
Read it here: https://www.congress.gov/108/plaws/publ333/PLAW-108publ333.htm
The Act aims to promote aid to North Koreans and to help North Korean refugees, for example. It also highlights the despotic nature of the North Korean government and it identifies the existence of suppression of civic liberties and human rights. Additionally, it basically highlights China’s role as the proxy puppet-master behind it all.
Don’t have time to read it all? This is the Act’s purpose in its own verbiage.
The UN has vastly overreached here and it is doing so on faulty pretexts, such as infringing on foreign sovereignty. It is improperly representing the American circumstances, on behalf of NK and China, to meet its agenda.
First of all, this is a clear and blatant move intended to appease the new member state — China.
China should be no authority on human rights, as it is a frequent abuser of them both now and in the past. The admission of China to the HRC is a massive mistake and is in my opinion, intended to capture the US again into joining globalist organizations.
I understand having a representation of states at the table to achieve some sort of homogenous understanding of governance and moral practices, but this is deeply corrupt and out of place.
In calling for the abolishment of this act, the UN is rejecting the American cause for democracy and liberty in the Korean peninsula. Not only that, but it is challenging our humanitarian mission there; sort of counter-productive to the HRC wouldn’t you say?
Lastly, and worst of all, while it undermines the American mission, should its request to abolish the act come through, the UN would directly be supporting Chinese hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region. The US policy and hard stance on China and North Korea, for al it ahs yet to fix, is still a major reason we can contend in the region. A North Korea that could act without threats from the US would be drastic for the region, South Korea in particular…
I have a hunch the UN is trying to reel the US back into similar globalist organizations that Trump ahs turned his back on as a means of furthering its agenda. Doing it this way though, by appeasing China, is grossly hypocritical and unethical. Shame on the UN for regressing and delegitimizing its integrity and mission.
The US needs to continue to stand up against Chinese abuses, both on the global stage and in bilateral situations.
